|
Identifying
Employer’s Liability Fraud
Fraud within the insurance industry is as old as the concept
itself, but most insurance companies actively seek to put an end
to this practice. In cases where fraud is suspected, it is not
unusual for private investigators to be retained and utilised to
prove cases in court and as grounds for case dismissal, or
denial of claims. It is not unusual during a time of recession,
for insurance liability claims to increase exponentially, and
often disgruntled workers may attempt to pass off artificial
claims. There are a several indicators that investigative
personnel look for in addition to the normal procedures, that
may indicate any signs of fraud.
For UK employers liability insurance
please visit
this site. Need car insurance? You may like to know about
temporary car insurance!
What further complicates insurance companies’ attempts to
identify fraud is that often, suspicious claims appear to be so,
due to negligence on behalf of employers. There is a reasonable
expectation placed upon companies to afford labourers a safe
working environment, and to additionally, utilise sound business
practices. Unfortunately, this is not always applicable, but not
all accidents or injuries sustained on the job are caused by
employer negligence. Whether or not the grievance lies with
employer or employee, insurers cannot deny paying out the claims
to justified recipients.
One indicator that catches the attention of accident
investigators when a claim being considered, involves the length
of time that has passed between the time of the incident and
when the claim was sought. When an injury occurs, a report
should be filed immediately with a supervisor, and properly
logged into the accident report and first aid logs. Rest
assured, that insurance investigators will thoroughly inspect
these records when considering any claim.
An exception, in which logs and reporting evidence are of little
assistance, occurs in situation where the claimant’s injuries
were sustained over a long period of time. Typically, these
cases involve deafness, mesothelioma, and other traumas or
conditions that could be considered related to long-term
exposure to harmful substances or noisy environments during the
course of their daily labour functions.
Regardless of the type of injury sustained, investigators
thoroughly consider evidence provided by medical experts. These
findings are typically compared to entries in the company’s
accident log book, and are scrutinized for previous entries that
may be similar to the current claimants case.
Accurate record keeping is detriment to employers in need of
evidence during the course of claim investigations. It has been
noted that some companies attempt to fraudulently alter records
after claims arise, with intentions of removing any similar
incidences recorded, that may shine a negative light on their
business. Suspicion of this occurring, is a red flag to
investigators, and could later play a large factor in whether or
an insurance provider will later seek damage recovery from the
company.
Records, such as these, if properly kept, can often benefit
companies in litigation, and this is one of the most effective
forms of defence a business can possess when seeking to defend
themselves against fraudulent activities or claims. Notes of
great importance include:
• Employees absence history, especially since the incident
• Prior work related claims of a similar nature reported by
employees
• Locating any witnesses to incidents and taking a detail
statement
• Noting any confrontations between claimant and co-workers or
management
• Document possible employee discontent, such as less hours or
denial of a raise
• Correspondence or communication from staff referencing their
claim or condition
In closing, the most fail-safe and effective defence against
prior and future claims that an employer can afford themselves
and their staff, is to consistently provide a safe working
environment, and ensure the existence of adequate employer’s
liability insurance coverage at all times.
Home |